We correct factual errors on this site as soon as we confirm them, and we record each material change here with its date. If you find a wrong date, score, venue or rule, tell us through the contact page with the page address and a source, and we will check it against the PCB, Cricinfo or a match report before changing anything.
Last checked 27 October 2026.
What counts as a correction?
A correction is a change to a fact, such as a date, venue, score, name, number or rule, that was wrong or unsupported when we published it. Spelling fixes, new data added after an announcement and layout changes are not logged here. When the PCB announces something we had marked as pending, such as a PSL 12 rule, the page simply updates, and its “Last checked” line shows the new date.
Which corrections have we made?
| Date | Page | What was wrong | What it says now |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 October 2026 | Multan Sultans | The overall record was given as 91 played, 46 won, 40 lost and 5 no result. | Our count from Cricsheet and the league tables is 90 matches, 46 won, 41 lost (one in a Super Over) and 3 no result. The Wikipedia figure is noted beside it and the difference is not yet reconciled. |
| 28 October 2026 | Head-to-head pages | New pages. | Built from Cricsheet’s PSL data. Its league results match our points tables except for seven matches it lacks: six abandoned without a ball bowled, and one PSL 1 match added from Cricinfo. |
| 28 October 2026 | Rawalpindiz and Multan Sultans | Lineage was left unresolved and Rawalpindiz was called a new team with no finals; the 2021 title and four finals were credited to the current Multan Sultans. | Rawalpindiz is the former Multan franchise, sold in February 2026 and renamed; the title and finals were won by that franchise. The current Multan Sultans began as the Sialkot Stallionz. |
| 28 October 2026 | Team owners, expansion guide and teams hub | The 2026 expansion was said to have added Hyderabad Kingsmen and Rawalpindiz. | The expansion added Hyderabad Kingsmen and the Sialkot franchise, now Multan Sultans. The Rawalpindiz fee is shown as a reported sale price. |
| 27 October 2026 | PSL 3 (2018) | The playoffs before the final were all placed in Lahore. | The qualifier was in Dubai on 18 March; both eliminators were at Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore, and the final was in Karachi. |
| 27 October 2026 | PSL 8 (2023) | Eliminator 1 was given no date and no score. | Eliminator 1 was on 16 March at Gaddafi Stadium: Peshawar Zalmi 183/8 beat Islamabad United 171/6 by 12 runs. |
| 27 October 2026 | PSL 6 (2021) | Only the qualifier and the final had dates. | The qualifier and Eliminator 1 were both on 21 June and Eliminator 2 on 22 June, in Abu Dhabi. |
| 27 October 2026 | PSL 4 (2019) | Shane Watson’s run total was shown with a conflicting figure of 435. | The total is 430 runs, from ProPakistani’s awards list and Cricket Australia’s report on the final. |
| 27 October 2026 | PSL 9 final | The page said the win came with the last pair at the crease, which we could not support. | The sentence was removed and the scorecard facts remain. |
| 27 October 2026 | PSL 8 final | The page said the attendance was not stated. | The reported attendance of 24,012 is now shown. |
| 27 October 2026 | PSL 11 auction | The number of registered players was given as 888. | Geo Super and ProPakistani both report 879 registered players, so the pages now say 879. |
Several of these came from a second pass in which we compared our season pages with Cricinfo, CricTracker, Dawn and PCB match reports instead of relying on Wikipedia alone. Where a venue or date still cannot be confirmed, the page says so; examples are the first eliminator of PSL 1 and the eliminators of PSL 4.
How do we check a reported error?
We look for the PCB release or the official scorecard first, then for two independent reports that agree. If sources conflict we show the figure we trust and name the conflict on the page, as we did for Watson’s total. If we cannot settle it, we mark the item as unconfirmed and do not guess. Our full approach is set out in the methodology and data sources page and the editorial policy.
To report an error, use the contact page. Include the page, the line you think is wrong and a link to your source. We aim to review reports promptly, but we change a page only after we have verified the fix.